• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Identity Woman

Identity Woman

Independent Advocate for the Rights and Dignity of our Digital Selves

  • About
  • IETF Research
  • She’s Geeky: AI Edition
  • Weekly SSI Newsletter
  • Blog
  • Media Coverage
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Big Ideas

Open Space for Identity in Vancouver in July

Kaliya Young · June 1, 2006 · Leave a Comment

This Identity Open Space is being jointly produced by Liberty Alliance and a group of people who are leading participants in the Internet Identity Workshop. We hope to provide attendees with a highly interactive format in which to explore the topic of user-centric identity. (((This is NOT the next IIW that Workshop2006b will be in November.)))
The goal of this support a face-to-face space to continue the emerging, ever changing conversation around identity. Not every one can be everywhere. It is our hope that it will provide an opportunity for those in the northwest (Oregon, Washington State, British Columbia) from a variety of fields – socially good techies, Web 2.0 innovators, Identity Gang participants to meet face to face and dialogue.
The wiki is here and registration here. Here is who is coming.
Topics likely to be discussed at the conference represent the many identity issues experts are working on today including:
* technical standards and specifications,
* use cases for a range of industries
* applying existing or emerging applications or platforms,
* Social and policy issues.
* Your Topics Post on the wiki

There are a lot of amazing minds working to solve the Internet’s ‘identity crisis’, and bringing them together frequently—formally and informally—is helping to drive tremendous progress in a marketplace full of pent-up demand for opportunities with truly empowered *end users* in the driver’s seat. – Brett McDowell, Director Liberty Alliance

Open Space meetings are successful because of the passion, energy and engagement of each and every attendee from the moment they decide to attend through their return to the workplace to implement what they experienced at the event—it’s truly a community-building event that doesn’t end. Building on our proven track record, this event will continue to expand participation in the conversation around the rapidly evolving identity landscape.
Kaliya Hamlin (aka Identity Woman) is the Open Space facilitator for this event. Rave reviews of the last Internet Identity Workshop she facilitated.
The fee will be $50 less if you are staying at the conference hotel please see the registration page for details.
Registration for Identity Open Space is $150 USD (June 16, 2006).
From June 17, 2006 – July 16, 2006 the price increases to $.
Onsite registration will be available at a fee of $300.
Accessibility is a core value of IIW – please contact me if you want cost is an issue for you.
Social Media:
The Tag for this event broadly is IdentityOS
The Tag for this specific event is IdentityOSVan

Technorati Tags: conference, identity, iiw, iiw2006, LibertyAlliance, Open space, unconference

Identity interoperability @ Net2

Kaliya Young · May 30, 2006 · Leave a Comment

In the panel on Social Networking here at Net2.
Identity and profile sharing between sites is critical to using these tools in civil society. Planetwork where I am Network Director has been a long time advocate for open standards in this sector – the Augmented Social Network paper outlined the vision. We are excited about Open Standards from OASIS – XRI (I-names) and XDI to support identity and data sharing. They are cooperating with the with OpenID on Yadis too.
Planetwork is working on a project to build out open source, open standards based infrastructure to make it all work.
I am also working on i-tags to support identity in tagging.

Technorati Tags: datasharing, identity, Net2, nptech, interoperability, Web2.0, XDI, XRI, YADIS

I-Tags at Net2

Kaliya Young · May 30, 2006 · Leave a Comment

I am at the Net2 session on Tagging.Here is how I described the value itags to Beth Kanter.
I have been working with Mary Hodder, Drummond Reed and Andy Dale on itags. It is an open adhoc standard we are proposing for alowing people to use their identity while they tag. This could be a URL they ‘own’ (OpenID) an i-name (XRI) they have or another UUID.
Creators of content could use this to assert CC licenses and provide a long term persistent way to have attribution. People can assert tags across silos – multiple blogs that one posts on and multiple media tagging sites that one tags on.

Technorati Tags: bethkanter, community, identity, itags, Net2, inames, XRI

viva data liberation @ Net Squared today

Kaliya Young · May 30, 2006 · Leave a Comment

I am connecting up to the social change and technology part of my persona today at Net Squared. Tomorrow I am going to be leading a session on identity in the ‘making it happen’ part of the conference.
The opening session mentioned the emergence of the Social Web – I was like wow – we have been using that to describe what happens when identity becomes part of the web.
At the conference
Seven sectors are participating:

  • Philanthropists
  • International NGO
  • American Nonprofits
  • Infratech – the big companies
  • Web Services companies
  • Digerati
  • Nonprofit Technology Assitance Providers the “Helper community”
  • The opening speaker is Angela Glover CEO of Policy Link – Black Woman for the opening keynote. Well it is certainly out of the norm of regular tech conferences – Hopefully the rest will be out of the box too.She began by talking about the regional context. The economy setting the stage for opportunity – not just income support and raising minimum wage but how to build wealth and assets. Technology is how we achieve what we want to achieve – in light of need for democratic participation.
    She did call it two point zero…maybe that is not under Tim’s Trademark.
    (almost) Direct quote from Angela Glover – We need to liberate Data – structured DATA SHARING.
  • I was so excited when I heard this – I wrote and ad hoc banner for the table
  • Viva – data liberation.
    Free the Data Use Open Standards
    XDI (XRI Data Interchange)
  • Beth Kanter has a picture of it.
  • She closed by saying that we want people to be agents for change on their own behalf.

Technorati Tags: conference, datasharing, Net2, nptech, openstandards, Planetwork, bethkanter, Web2.0, XDI, XRI

Publish all SSN eliminate the 'secret'

Kaliya Young · May 27, 2006 · Leave a Comment

A radical identity solution – publish all SSN eliminate the ‘secret’:

It’s time to eliminate the SSN façade. The solution to the problem of identity theft is a “cold turkey” one: publish all SSNs to ensure that no organization has the opportunity to suggest that their secrecy can be maintained. The Social Security Administration should pick a date 2-3 years in the future and announce that on that day it will publish the SSNs to the world.
The most obvious objection here is also the point: What about all the companies, and perhaps most importantly the Social Security Administration, that rely on the SSN as a secret? Won’t that really change the way they do business today? I sincerely hope not (because they should have stronger controls today), but I suspect so (because they don’t). There is a big difference (in controls) between the initial use of the SSN as validation of identity for a financial transaction (say, to get a credit card or purchase a car) and the ongoing relationship between an individual and an organization that retains the SSN.
The organizations currently using SSNs have other information available to them from their existing customer base – mutually-agreed upon “secrets” and transaction histories among others – and methods of “out-of-band” verification like sending verifying mail to the address-of-record. These techniques are more useful with the history of a relationship; often, setting up an account relies on information being provided by the consumer (or prospective fraudster).
A government mandate is the only way to build out a much stronger program for identity protection – one built on mathematics rather than on 150 thousand people keeping a secret. Otherwise, the laws for protecting the SSN will continue to grow in volume and complexity, organizations will continue to build in more controls, and we will continue to have our identities compromised.

Perilocity is also writing about this:

What’s your social?” How many times have you heard that question, from credit card companies, doctors’ offices, and just about every other type of organization? Perhaps you were confident that all these organizations are keeping your “social” completely confidential.

Security experts held a contest this month to show just how quick and effective Google hacking can be. During a technology security-industry meeting in Seattle, contestants using only Google for less than an hour turned up sensitive information — potentially useful for financial fraud — on about 25 million people. They dug up various combinations of people’s names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and credit-card information, including some card numbers apparently left exposed by the U.S. Department of Justice.

The big problem is that so many organizations collect too much such information and then don’t bother to secure it.
I think it would be most useful if some organization were to organize a reputation system that made it its business to discover which entities had the most such information visible via the Internet and findable via google or Yahoo! Such an organization could report first to the affected entities, with a time limit before it would make the information public. I don’t know how potential liability would be handled in such a case, but once over that little hurdle, such an organization would be doing a great public service and could probably make a bundle advising organizations on what not to publish.
And of course the biggest identity leaks don’t come through web search engines, anyway. They come through companies mailing unencrypted tapes or keeping back data on disks that are then stolen.

Where is 'the line' – the freedom to socialize

Kaliya Young · May 27, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Ohan Pinto picked up on my post about the proposed law by the suburban caucus to ban access to social networking sites in Public Libraries and Schools. (oh and my name is spelled Kaliya – not Kalia) She said this:

I am not against social networking, but I have kids, and I am concerned… especially when I’m aware that kids today do things without thinking of the consequences. I do not see this move as a bad move by the feds. It may very well turn out to be good. This post by Michael Miller on Warning children about online dangers gives a nice insight on the real dangers of social networking sites and how “minors” can get exploited.

One needs to draw the line somewhere….

That “somewhere” is not by inhibiting the freedom to organize and gather in online space – by people using . Adults who don’t have access to computers at home go to libraries to surf the web, get email an social network. Increasingly online networking tools will be used to organize to make change – they are places where people gather and the 1st amendment applies

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Dana Boyd has done a lot of ethnographic research with young adults to understandwhat they are doing in online space. She has this to say about the legislation. If you are concerned about your children’s behavior get involved in their life enough that they share what they are up to and you have open communication channels to share with them what is and is not acceptable. One of the critical parts is an ‘autonomous’ space – they are connecting and communicating with one another as peers – see her Bill O’Reilly Interview.

Creativity resisting DRM….

Kaliya Young · May 23, 2006 · Leave a Comment

My Friend Gregory Heller helped produce this really fun protest at the WinHEC conference where DRM was on the agenda. The sent the DRM Elimination Crew out along with launching Defective by Design.
Good to see good folks out there fighting for freedom.

Canadian Identity Crisis

Kaliya Young · May 19, 2006 · Leave a Comment

There is nothing like ego searching to get you back into blogging (I have take over a week off). I just found this post that points to my page on Canadian Identity Crisis because of the Bruce Mau Essay that I have up on a page at Identity Woman. It also points to the Molson – “I AM CANADIAN” television advertisement (I had never seen it until today). and makes an allusion that it is similar to another Canadian identity presentation we are all familiar with.
The saddest part is that Molson is no longer a canadian owned company.

Congress Targets Social Network sites – to be blocked from Schools and Libraries

Kaliya Young · May 11, 2006 · Leave a Comment

WOW this is really intense.
The freedom to meet and organize is FUNDAMENTAL to what it means to be a citizen in this country.
This was in slashdot headlines and is quite shocking.

MySpace and other social-networking sites like LiveJournal.com and Facebook are the potential targets for a proposed federal law that would effectively require most schools and libraries to render those Web sites inaccessible to minors, an age group that includes some of the category’s most ardent users.
High Impact
What’s new:
A proposed federal law would effectively require schools and libraries to render social networking sites inaccessible to minors.
Bottom line:
Law would likely affect more than just social networking sites. Blogger.com, AOL and Yahoo’s instant messaging features might be included in proposal’s definition.
advertisement
“When children leave the home and go to school or the public library and have access to social-networking sites, we have reason to be concerned,” Rep. Michael Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican, told CNET News.com in an interview.
Fitzpatrick and fellow Republicans, including House Speaker Dennis Hastert, on Wednesday endorsed new legislation that would cordon off access to commercial Web sites that let users create public “Web pages or profiles” and also offer a discussion board, chat room, or e-mail service.
That’s a broad category that covers far more than social-networking sites such as Friendster and Google’s Orkut.com. It would also sweep in a wide range of interactive Web sites and services, including Blogger.com, AOL and Yahoo’s instant-messaging features, and Microsoft’s Xbox 360, which permits in-game chat.
Fitzpatrick’s bill, called the Deleting Online Predators Act, or DOPA, is part of a new, poll-driven effort by Republicans to address topics that they view as important to suburban voters. Republican pollster John McLaughlin polled 22 suburban districts and presented his research at a retreat earlier this year. Rep. Mark Kirk, an Illinois Republican, is co-sponsoring the measure.
The group, which is calling itself the “Suburban Caucus,” convened a press conference on Wednesday to announce new legislation it hopes will rally conservative supporters–and prevent the Democrats from retaking the House of Representatives during the November mid-term election.

Novell launches Bandit

Kaliya Young · May 10, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Dale Olds impressed a lot of folks at IIW leading the session to map out all the different open source identity related code that currently exists and that would be good to have.
DIDW reported today that Novelle launched Bandit.

Bandit is a system of loosely-coupled components to provide consistent identity services.
It implements open standard protocols and specifications such that identity services can be constructed, accessed, and integrated from multiple identity sources. The Bandit system supports many authentication methods and provides user-centric credential management. On this base of a common identity model, Bandit is building additional services needed for Role Based Access Control (RBAC) and for the emission of records to verify compliance with higher level policies.
The Bandit community does not intend to do this in isolation. We are doing our part to build foundational components of the emerging identity fabric. All components of Bandit are Open Source and we will work with industry standards and other open source projects to provide open, interoperable, decentralized, identity services.

Identity For Dolphins

Kaliya Young · May 10, 2006 · Leave a Comment

This came up on the identity list:

Bottlenose dolphins appear to whistle their “names” to each other, according to a new study. Researchers say that this type of referential communication is extremely rare in nature, and until now had not been clearly shown in a non-human animal.

Scott Always Where Name Tag

Kaliya Young · May 9, 2006 · Leave a Comment

I thought this would be a light entertaining identity interlude. enjoy.
I am working on my BayCHI talk this morning and…the things people get famous for. Apparently Scott Ginsberg ‘who always wheres a nametag’ got on CNN. He even has a ‘professional speaking video’ on YouTube. Why are you wearing a name tag – its you friendlier and more approachable. He does it to make an ‘unforgetable first impression.’ His blog is “HELLO, my name is BLOG” it looks like it is slammed right now.

Digital Rights New Rights for a New Era – Lessig and Stallman

Kaliya Young · April 28, 2006 · Leave a Comment

There is a great new documentary coming out ALTERNATIVE FREEDOM produced by Project Free Zarathustra. They have a great list of links.

National Identity Cards in Australia

Kaliya Young · April 28, 2006 · Leave a Comment

This showed up on Slashdot yesturday and is from the Sydney Morning Harold:

AUSTRALIANS will need a photo identity card within four years to receive Medicare and welfare payments but will not be forced to carry it at all times.
The new “smart card” will contain “enhanced security” and replace 17 existing cards for Medicare benefits, family tax, child-care and unemployment payments, pensions, Austudy and pharmaceutical and transport concessions….
The card will also be used to check identities for immigration and security purposes and to crack down on fraud. Its embedded computer chip will include a photograph, number, signature, date of birth and address.

Where is the Valley's political power?

Kaliya Young · April 27, 2006 · Leave a Comment

I have been wondering about this for a while. Where is the companies in the Valley’s political might? and where is the political organizing amongst the people who work in this industry? In Europe the geeks organized to get the European parliament to ban software patents. It seems like it should be easy enough to organize to save the internet. I am going to do my part and organize Planetwork’s activities around One Web Day.
This was articulated by Marc Evans on his blog:

The Net Neutrality campaign (a.k.a. Save the Internet) to keep the Internet tollgate-free and/or tier-free continues to gain momentum. What’s troubling, however, is Om Malik’s contention that many start-ups and Silicon Valley companies and fairly of the issue and why it matters. One of the Silicon Valley’s weaknesses is a lack of political savviness. Sure, many companies and executives donate money to politicians and political parties but there does not seem to be a well-organized and effective lobbying team that can be turned on in Washington when needed. Peter Chester suggests a reason for the lack of activity among the bigger players such as Yahoo, Google and Microsoft is they have relationship with carriers and cablecos that they don’t want to damage.

New Hampshire to stand up against REAL ID

Kaliya Young · April 27, 2006 · Leave a Comment

GovExec.com’s Daily Briefing REports this:

New Hampshire lawmakers are considering a proposal to reject a federal mandate for national identification standards.
The state House last month passed a measure, H.B. 1582, to refuse participation in a program created under a 2005 law that requires state-issued IDs to meet national standards by 2008. The New Hampshire proposal has been forwarded to the Senate for further consideration. ….
In written testimony submitted to the committee, Jim Harper, the director of information policy studies at the Cato Institute, said it would be a grave mistake for New Hampshire lawmakers to stick with the REAL ID program out of fear that they would lose $3 million in federal grant money to comply with the law.
Harper cited a report released last year by a Virginia task force that estimated full compliance with REAL ID in the Old Dominion State would cost as much as $63 million per year. He also noted an estimate from the National Conference of State Legislatures that it would cost $9 billion for states to implement REAL ID nationally.

It seems that this is a topic that we should talk about at IIW next week. I titled the session “The Current Political Climate.”

Jigsaw aggregating everyone…

Kaliya Young · April 17, 2006 · Leave a Comment

I have had a challenge with my RSS reader. Making things slow as molasses. So I have not really be reading to much. I decided to do some surfing around and likely will abandon readers all together except for maybe 20 core blogs. The rest I will do by surfing and searching.
Today I found this by surfing through TechCruhch. Jigsaw I quoted it extensively because it was so startling and relevant for the identity community to consider.

Jigsaw is a marketplace for contact information, and it is very efficient. It boasts detailed personal contact information for 2.5 million people, and 7,000 new people are added every day. If you want the name, title, email address, direct phone line and/or address of any executive of any company, there is a very good chance Jigsaw will already have it in its database and will sell it to you. And if you are a sales guy and have no ethical concerns about where you get your contact information, you probably already know all about Jigsaw.
Unlike competitors like Hoovers and InfoUSA, which gather company information by semi-legitimate means such as scouring SEC filings, cold calling companies and asking for information, and reviewing other public documents, Jigsaw simply pays people to upload other people’s contact information. Users are paid $1 for every contact they upload, and some users have uploaded information on tens of thousands of people. See the demo (and note the other demos on that page as well). Jigsaw is also self correcting, and incentivizes people to also correct bad contact information.
That’s right, the next time you hand out a business card to someone or otherwise divulge your contact information, you may be handing it out to the entire world.
Here’s how it works: Sign up and start downloading contact information. This includes name, title, company, address, email and direct phone line. For example, a quick search brought up all of this personal.
But wait, it gets much worse.
Anyone can find out if Jigsaw has their contact information via a link on the home page, but amending or trying to delete that information simply puts a flag on the data with the changes noted – but the original information also remains.There appears to be no way to remove your own contact information from Jigsaw once someone has entered it into their database. There is no method that I was able to find on the website to do this (including in the privacy policy), and an email to the company asking about this went unanswered (its been three business days now).
Jigsaw has a carefully worded privacy policy to deal with the fact that they are the antithesis of privacy. They say “This privacy policy covers how, when and why we collect, use and share information about our users…This policy does not apply to our collection and use of data about companies and contacts contained in our database system.”
Is Jigsaw legal? Maybe in the U.S., although I’d love to see a class action case brought against them. Is it ethical? Absolutely not. Every Jigsaw employee and investor has dirty hands and they should be ashamed of themselves.
Like Plaxo, Jigsaw makes money while pushing costs to other people. In Plaxo’s case, its spam. In Jigsaw’s case, its making private contact information public. The problem here is that Jigsaw’s actions aren’t easily found out by people getting constant cold calls and emails – it’s very unlikely they’ll know that these people got this contact information at Jigsaw in the first place.
If they wanted to do this right, they’d set up a marketplace where individuals could choose to sell (or give away) their contact information. The owner of the data could set the price, and Jigsaw could take a cut. Would this model work? Perhaps not, but that just proves my point. The only reason Jigsaw does work is because they don’t have to bear the costs that they push to third parties – all of the people who are in their database.

Cool Human Internet tricks

Kaliya Young · April 15, 2006 · Leave a Comment

They are relevant to identity because it is interesting how people use the net to form their identity and do interesting things to make a buck doing things that would be impossible without it.
There are a few interesting “Internet Tricks” that I have come across and I thought I would share. The earlier one is One Million Pixels – where a guy sold one web page’s pixels for a dollar each in minium blocks of 10×10. He made his money.
This one a guy started off with One Red Paper Clip and is trading it up for a house he started less then a year ago and is now trading for a years free rent in Pheonix.

dealing with Identity silos today.

Kaliya Young · April 15, 2006 · Leave a Comment

I was talking to a colleague in the tech industry who shared with me a story of how they coped with the silos of identity.
They get e-mail sent to the corporation machine and forward it to their real machine outside the ‘silo’ to actually read it and respond. What are we doing to people these days? Silos create fragmentation that does not seem healthy or whole.

Talking at BayCHI on Unconference Design May 9

Kaliya Young · April 15, 2006 · Leave a Comment

I am going to be talking at BayCHI on unconference design next month on May 9. It will be fun to share what I have learned from my years of conference attendance and recent foray into helping produce and facilitated unconferences like the Internet Identity Workshop and Mashup Camp.
I went to BayCHI on Tuesday to get a sense of the crowd. T hey had great questions for the Social Search companies there. Pandora, Live365, Netflix, Digg and Del.icio.us.
The funniest part of the evening was when the Digg guy was like ‘way back in the Web 1.5 days’ and the live365 guy goes ‘you mean in November’ – everyone cracked up.
It reminded me of a comment that was made in a conversation with Doc and Mary Referring to an event… in ‘internet time’ that was three years ago (but really it was a year in solar time).

Brand Identity Matters – Apple to Benifit from MS losses

Kaliya Young · April 15, 2006 · 1 Comment

The thing I love about identity as a perspective to look at the world is that it shows up so often. Apple could double Market share on MS Defections.

Consumers are so distrustful of Microsoft that Apple could double its market share due to defections from the Windows operating system, a report by market analysis firm Forrester Research says.
The remarks come in a report that looks at brand identity and the importance of a company’s brand. The report also studies the effect a company’s brand has on the pricing of its products and the demographics of those that purchase the products.

This article says what I have sensed for a while. This coming back to school and Holiday season could mean big increases in Apple’s market share. For one thing Vista has slipped to January, if you need to do something on Windows, Apples will soon boot that OS so you can do what ever you need to in legacy land.
In the end it is the personal computer – not the corporate machine. People need to be able to get along with and bond with their computers in a personal way. You can do that with a Mac.

Technorati Tags: apple, brand, identity, Microsoft, usability

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 28
  • Go to Next Page »

     Copyright © 2026 Identity Woman  evelurie.com/web design/develop     

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Sitemap
  • Contact