• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Identity Woman

Independent Advocate for the Rights and Dignity of our Digital Selves

  • About
  • Services
  • Media Coverage
  • Podcast
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Field Guide to Internet Trust Models: Four Party Model

Kaliya Young · November 30, 2014 · 6 Comments

Four-Party Model

A four-party model provides a comprehensive set of interlocking legal contracts that detail roles, responsibilities, and technical methods. In order to take part in the network, each party must agree to one of the contracts in a given framework. Identity providers specialize in providing support for particular roles.

Examples: The credit card networks, such as Visa and Mastercard, are implemented as four party networks. These represent a large collection of individuals and institutions, each of which must routinely trust participants they’ve never encountered before.

Parties of all types continually join and leave the network, making it impractical for any single organization to track them all. By creating a standard set of well defined roles that work together, the Visa and Mastercard enable risk assessors to specialize.

Because of the vast difference in the size of the entities involved (anywhere from an individual person to a multi-national corporation), and the complexity of governing law, no single contract could be both complete and understandable by all parties.

To solve this problem, the network created a comprehensive, interlocking set of contracts that lay out all of the roles that entities can play. For each role, the appropriate contract specifies the interactions and responsibilities. The network design allows for multiple identity providers, each of whom can specialize in managing risk for a particular set of users. Risks are managed at the system level.

When to use: Closed network where all parties can be expected to sign a contract to join.

Advantages: Enables a network where participants of different sizes can interact smoothly with one another. Allows for specialization of risk management in a complex, constantly changing network where participants frequently join and leave.

Disadvantages: Depends upon the ability to create comprehensive contracts. Risk management can impose substantial costs on the network.

Ability to scale: Four party models can scale to a large number of participants.


The full papers is downloadable [Field-Guide-Internet-TrustID] Here is a link to introduction of the paper and a at the bottom of that post is a link to all the other models with descriptions.  Below are links to all the different models.

Sole source, Pairwise Federation,  Peer-to-Peer,
Three-Party Model 1) “Bring your Own” Portable Identity 2) “Winner Take All” Three Party Model:
Federations 1) Mesh Federations 2) Technical Federations 3) Inter-Federation Federations
Four-Party Model, Centralized Token Issuance, Distributed Enrollment, Individual Contract Wrappers, Open Trust Framework Listing
 

Internet Trust Models, My Papers, Trust Framework

ConvertKit Form

Join to get updates from Identity Woman

Kaliya is beginning to share regular updates about her work. This will help keep you up to date with all her work.

Success! Now check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

We won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Powered by ConvertKit

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Field Guide to Internet Trust Models: Mesh Federation says:
    November 30, 2014 at 9:35 pm

    […] Four-Party Model, Centralized Token Issuance, Distributed Enrollment, Individual Contract Wrappers, Open Trust Framework Listing […]

    Reply
  2. Field Guide to Internet Trust Models: Federations says:
    November 30, 2014 at 9:36 pm

    […] Four-Party Model, Centralized Token Issuance, Distributed Enrollment, Individual Contract Wrappers, Open Trust Framework Listing […]

    Reply
  3. Field Guide to Internet Trust Models: Peer-to-Peer Trust and Identity says:
    November 30, 2014 at 9:39 pm

    […] Four-Party Model, Centralized Token Issuance, Distributed Enrollment, Individual Contract Wrappers, Open Trust Framework Listing […]

    Reply
  4. Field Guide to Internet Trust Models: Introduction says:
    November 30, 2014 at 9:40 pm

    […] Four-Party Model: An interlocking, comprehensive set of contracts allows different types of entity to trust one another for particular types of transaction. […]

    Reply
  5. Field Guide to Internet Trust Models: Centralized Token Issuance, Distributed Enrollment says:
    November 30, 2014 at 9:47 pm

    […] Four-Party Model, Centralized Token Issuance, Distributed Enrollment, Individual Contract Wrappers, Open Trust Framework Listing […]

    Reply
  6. Field Guide to Internet Trust Models: The Sole Source says:
    November 30, 2014 at 10:20 pm

    […] Four-Party Model, Centralized Token Issuance, Distributed Enrollment, Individual Contract Wrappers, Open Trust Framework Listing […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

     Copyright © 2023 Identity Woman  evelurie.com/web design/develop     

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
  • Contact