• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Identity Woman

Identity Woman

Independent Advocate for the Rights and Dignity of our Digital Selves

  • About
  • IETF Research
  • She’s Geeky: AI Edition
  • Weekly SSI Newsletter
  • Blog
  • Media Coverage
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Archives for January 2023

Questions Asked at Exploring the Future of Digital Identity: Insights from Better Identity Coalition Day

Ali · January 21, 2023 ·

This post highlights the two questions I asked during the event of Better Identity Coalition Day on the 25th of January, 2023.

Short Preamble to the Event

The Better Identity Coalition is dedicated to working closely with policymakers to advance digital security, privacy protections, and user-friendliness for all individuals. The coalition is made up of some of the most successful companies worldwide, and its purpose is to encourage education and collaboration on securing identities online.

They are exploring innovative solutions to allow people in the United States to take control of their identities and operate their businesses online in a risk-free and protected environment.

During the Event, I Posed Two Questions

On January 25, I went to the Better Identity Coalition Day, and while there, I asked two questions. 

1st Question:

I questioned whether or not they are aware that the federal government of the United States is going to issue secure digital IDs to a certain demographic. For instance, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is going to start issuing digital green cards soon, utilizing the format of verifiable credentials.

Click here for the detailed conversation on the 1st question.

– Kaliya asking Congressman Bill Foster if he was familiar with the SVIP Program

2nd Question:

I also questioned a recent conspiracy theory involving Phyto that suggests Apple, Google, and Microsoft are involved in a scheme to grant the NSA access to cloud data. While I was not asking for a response to this theory, I wanted to bring attention to the issue of conspiracy theories within the Meta industry. As a leader, I was curious to know what steps they and other leaders in the room were taking to collectively address this problem.

Click here for the detailed conversation on the 2nd question.

– Kaliya asking a question of the ED of the FIDO Alliance about conspiracy theory

IAPP Event: An Intro for Data Privacy Pros to Self-Sovereign Identity

Ali · January 12, 2023 ·

An event hosted by the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) asked me to give a talk on the subject of self-sovereign identity and provide a foundational overview for privacy professionals.

The following are some of the primary issues discussed throughout the event:

  • Exactly what it means to have a self-sovereign identity.
  • The direction in which the space is moving.
  • What privacy professionals need to know.

The Panel was put together by Katharina Koerner, the Principal Technology Researcher at IAPP. Myself, Dominique Beron CEO of walt.id and Kristina Yashuda, who does Identity Standards at MSFT.

Kailya, Kristina, Dominique, Katharine

Self-sovereign identity (SSI) is essentially a fresh take on digital identity solutions. Its goal is to empower users with additional options in managing their online identities and in deciding how much of their private data to make public.

In this manner, the self-sovereign identity technology provides assistance for the data reduction and purpose restriction tenets of privacy.

Simply click this link to see the whole video.

DWeb 2022 Talk: Decentralized Identity Open Standards

Ali · January 10, 2023 ·

At the invitation of the organizers of DWeb Camp 2022, I delivered a session on the subject of three open standards for decentralized identities.

Kaliya talking at DWebCamp – clicking on photo goes to the video.

Decentralized identifiers, verifiable credentials, and decentralized identifier communication were discussed throughout this session as three of the most important developing standards for decentralized identity.

Decentralized Identifiers: I went through a variety of issues in this standard, including how a decentralized identifier (DID) differs from private name spaces and globally controlled registries, what it looks like, the standard components of a DID document, DID specifications, and more.

Verifiable Credentials: In this section, I discussed what verifiable credentials are, how they function, as well as characteristics and benefits such as extensive expressive capacity and a vast array of potential applications.

Decentralized Identifier Communication: It is also known as DIDComm Messaging, and inside it, we are able to have peer-to-peer ownership of the social graph commons. During our presentation on this protocol for decentralized identification, I went through its viability and several uses, in addition to the mechanism behind it.

To that aim, I also discussed ways in which we might integrate many of the aforementioned open standards. In addition, two more standard ideas, the “personal data store” and “object capabilities,” have been offered in the conclusion.

Here is the link to the complete video:

https://archive.org/details/25-15-45_-_decentralized_identity_open_standards.qt

Forbes Quotes me on Social Media’s Future considering Safety & Identity

Ali · January 7, 2023 ·

I was cited in an article that was published in Forbes. The article was part of a series that was assessing the activities of 2022 on Twitter, the crazy policies of a new CEO, and the ramifications on the future of social media.

The article’s central emphasis was on the question of whether or not, in the near future of social media, users can feel secure while maintaining their individual identities.

I was quoted in the following lines as part of a discussion on the pros and cons of maintaining anonymity and pseudonymity online:

“Kaliya Young, Identity Woman, recalls an incident with Kathy Sierra, a female blogger and game developer, who in 2007, experienced death threats online and finally gave up her tech career, withdrew from the blogosphere and from online life. Following that incident there were calls to create blogger codes of conduct to stop this online violence against women.”

“’Look, if the first bad instances of online violence against women were treated seriously and the perpetrators that were not known were held to account then we would be in a different place [today]. They were not.’ Weeve, the pseudonym, of the hacker and self-described neo-Nazi and white supremacist responsible for posting false information about Sierra, had gone unpunished. As per Young, ‘He should have gone to prison for that. I was at the conference when they got up and said Kathy isn’t here because of death threats! It affected my life as a woman working in technology. Instead, he was left alone and went on to commit more acts of terrorism.’”

About the other side, you may find me in the following lines, where I’m contributing to a discussion regarding the importance of transparency and verification:

“Young stresses that it will take ‘time, rigour, investment and a proportionate approach’ to see the payoff. She points out that there is also a middle ground and it’s possible to implement speed bumps to make it less appealing for bad actors to exploit a poorly designed platform. ‘Designing a social media platform with possible consequences including, but not limited to privacy and security risks in mind (like One Dot Everyone, a consequence scanning tool), can improve the design while exploring alternatives to identity verification. Privacy Impact Assessments and Human Rights Impact Assessments will also go a long way to mitigate risks.’”

“Young questions the process for verification. Who will decide a person is who they say they are? Given her work in the Identity space, development of a trust framework should be leveraged to deal with the complexities of identity verification. But it continues to call into question what individuals or groups are responsible for defining the rules for verification?”

“Young professes that Identity has its place online but argues that the systems including the governance layers need to be in sync. ‘So men like Galloway and Haidt can go on about this ‘real name’ stuff all they want. Until the systems they built actually work as claimed and that men who use their real names and are known will be held to account, then what business do they have suggesting that?’”

Now, the purpose of this section is to provide a response to the following question: will technology save us? In the passage that follows, I am referenced as follows:

“Social media accounts have been around for a long time and Young makes clear they are, for the most part, run and managed by real people, attached to other real identities online that have more credibility: I think that analog is the new digital – meaning people will seek out and connect and value time with each other in person.”

Lastly, I am cited in the following lines on the remark that identity verification on social networks does not compute or make sense:

“As per Young, identity needs careful and thoughtful consideration:

There is a difference between the platform knowing who someone is and the whole world knowing the same. Who is enforcing what type of ID? Like Doctor, Young signals the marginalized, and those who have been suffering the abuse on the platform for over a decade. The rules for verification need to incorporate the varying definitions of identity that include cultural, general and local perspectives.”

You can read the full article here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/hessiejones/2023/01/04/will-the-future-of-social-media-mean-the-coexistence-of-safety-and-identity/?sh=5851ac587fba

Quoted in IEEE article about Worldcoin and their shift to Digital ID.

Ali · January 5, 2023 ·

I was asked to offer my perspective on the risks associated with the biometric data of Worldcoin, which was included in an article Spectrum IEEE published.

A crypto currency, Worldcoin, aspires to become the most globally and uniformly distributed cryptocurrency ever by allocating the same modest number of coins to every individual on Planet. The business has spent the last year creating a system that allows other parties to utilize its vast registration of “unique humans” for various identity-focused applications.

However, Worldcoin’s biometrics-focused approach is being greeted with widespread concerns regarding privacy, security, and transparency.

Here is the section of the article where I was mentioned about the possible risks posed by Worldcoin’s biometric data.

“It’s also questionable how useful the concept of ‘unique humanness’ really is outside of niche cryptocentric applications, says Kaliya Young, an identity researcher and activist. Identity plays a broader role in everyday life, she says: ‘I care what your university degrees are, where you were born, how much money you make, all sorts of attributes that PoP doesn’t solve for.'”

Another one:

“Worldcoin’s biggest challenge may not be the functionality of its technology but questions of trust. The central goal of blockchains is to avoid relying on centralized authorities, but by using complex, custom hardware to recruit users, the company is setting itself up as a powerful arbiter of digital identity. ‘Worldcoin posits that everyone in the world should have their eyeball scanned by them and they should be the decider of who’s a unique human,” says Young. ‘Please explain to me how that’s not ultracentralized.‘”

You may read the complete article by clicking on the following link: https://spectrum.ieee.org/worldcoin

     Copyright © 2026 Identity Woman  evelurie.com/web design/develop     

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Sitemap
  • Contact